It needed a little lateral thinking to assume a DB board, there are two versions. Early Sinar Copal shutters didn't include aperture control, the later Sinar Copal Auto Aperture shutter, and Digital did, as did the later Expolux shutters. In all cases the aperture os an intregal part of the DB mount
I bought a Compur #0 shutter yesterday for under£15 inc postage, I have quite a few NIB shutters #00. #0, & #1. I've been collecting shutters for quite a few years now, many unusual, rare, or prototypes.
Makes sense that DB mounted lenses would be cheaper as a buyer would either need a Sinar (or Sinar-compatible) camera and Sinar Copal shutter or would have to find a shutter to fit. With the latter there could be the issue of a shim being needed for optimum performance.
David
I've only ever seen shims with wide angle lenses, 90mm and shorter, where cell spacing is way more critical. The late Dean Jones who made Razzledog 5x4 Polaroid conversions found that the issue with unsharp early 90mm f6.8 Angulon lenses and was inconsistent Barrel lengths of the Compur shutters. Pre SN 5 million (1957) 90mm Angulons were hit and miss in terms of getting a sharp one. Linhof would take a complete batch and test and select only the best.
Dean would check the barrel length and if necessary strip the shutter and machine the barrels to the correct length, he found this corrected the sharpness issue. I bought a 90mm Angulon in the mid to late 1980s, and it was soft, I tried another which was similar. Years later I acquire a much later version which was fine.
Ian