- Joined
- Feb 17, 2022
- Messages
- 39
Edit: edit to this OP provided by a regulatory chemist who specialises in labelling and classification, using information and data publicly available on the C&L inventory and REACH registration provided by ECHA
Hello everyone!
A couple of weeks back, we hired a chemist that specialises in chemical regulation to have a look at our MSDS. We received his final report a few days ago and it turns out #510Pyro is significantly less hazardous than previously thought!
Summary:
Bottle labels from batches 0138 onwards will be updated to reflect the revised safety info.
Changelog to the SDS: Sections 2, 3, 14 and 16
Hello everyone!
A couple of weeks back, we hired a chemist that specialises in chemical regulation to have a look at our MSDS. We received his final report a few days ago and it turns out #510Pyro is significantly less hazardous than previously thought!
Summary:
- The acute toxicity estimate does not meet the threshold to classify the concentrate as acutely toxic by oral, dermal and inhalation exposure so the toxic symbol has been removed
- the concentrate does not reach the threshold to be classified as toxic to the environment either acutely or chronically (it was always our belief but now have the proof!) so the environmental hazard symbol has been removed
- the hazards which 510 Pyro possess do not warrant classification for transport
Bottle labels from batches 0138 onwards will be updated to reflect the revised safety info.
Changelog to the SDS: Sections 2, 3, 14 and 16
Attachments
Last edited: