Close Up.. but 'not quite macro'.

KenS

Active Member
Registered User
Hasp.jpg
Having spent a lot of 'career-time' making close-up images of a wide variety of 'biological' subjects, I am still willing and able to get close up and make an image of something that I believe may make (to my eye) an 'object of interest'. All too often, we seem to take a greater interest of much wider vistas.... and somehow we forget that getting up close and somewhat 'intimate' with a smaller object outside of the 'table-top' can be just as visually 'rewarding'. This was a hasp on a door which (if my ageing memory serves me well enough) I have already posted. This image is around 75% of the actual size of the hasp. The somewhat obvious 'holes' can be taken as firm evidence that, at some time in the past, someone has taken umbrage... and made a poor attempt at 'killing' the barn door.

Image was recorded in the early evening sunlight, on Kodak Plus-X behind my 240mm Sironar for 1/15 second @ f16+1/3 and given normal development in Pyrocat HD in BTZS tubes.

Ken
 

KenS

Active Member
Registered User
Parked.jpg
A cast iron hitch 'parked' where it might not 'tripped' over... or perhaps forgotten on the west side of a small shed on a long abandoned Albertan prairie farm.

Exposure was 1/60th @ f11+1/3 onto Kodak Tri-X behind my Rodenstock 240mm Sironar when mounted on a Linhof monorail for an early summer afternoon exposure. Film processed as 'normal' in Pyrocat HD using BTZS tubes.
 
Last edited:

KenS

Active Member
Registered User
PinkClematis.jpg

Alas... without my neighbour's permission, I snuck into his back yard with my camera and tripod one evening while they were out 'shopping'... (my bad!) to make one exposure of this 'group of four' light pink Clematis flowers in the 'shade'... with the early evening light, under a clear blue sky, about three quarters of an hour before the sun was due to 'sink' below the western horizon. I WAS forgiven after pleading 'guilty' to my minor transgression and they received a 'gifted' (matted and ready to frame) final print.

Exposed to Plus-x for 1/2 second @ 1/3 stop below f16 behind my 240mm Rodentstock Sironar and developed as "Normal" in Pyrocat HD in BTZS tubes.

Ken
 

KenS

Active Member
Registered User
DiamondRing2.jpg



We ‘collar’ the dog, ‘bell’ the cat, and willingly put a ring in the bull’s nose… all for a given purpose. I have, however, been unable to come up with any purpose … or an acceptable reason for this object to the side of an old and somewhat well weather-beaten farm shed door.


Exposure was onto Kodak Plus-X behind the 240mm Rodenstock Sironar on my Linhof monorail and, after a few months of being ‘lost’, was found hiding under a pile of ‘emptied’ film holders awaiting ‘dusting-out’ and re-loading. I seem to have either misplaced or torn out the ‘details page’ of this exposed sheet of film, but went ahead and developed as ‘normal’ in Pyrocat HD in BTZS tubes.

Ken
 

KenS

Active Member
Registered User
THANKS Keith.. ANOTHER OPTION WAS OFFERED BY photographer 'FRIEND.. who has decided it dwas used for hitching a rope to the nearby fence post to reduce the chance of the shed being blown across the yard by the 120+ km/hr Chinook wind from the west.

Ken
 
Last edited:

Keith Haithwaite

Active Member
Registered User
THANKS Keith.. ANOTHER OPTION WAS AFFERED BY PHOTOGRAApher 'FRIEND.. who has decided itdwasused fotr hitching rope to the nesrby frnce post tho reduce the chsnce of the shed being blown across the yard by the 120+ km/hr Chinook wind from the west.

aaaaken
:)
 

Bill Martindale

Member
Registered User
My 10 cents, (well Ken is Canadian) if it is about 4 feet off the ground it is for tethering a horse for grooming. Whatever it is it is still a fine shot.
 

KenS

Active Member
Registered User
Ken is an ex-pat from Glasgow from where I 'escaped' to Canada by working my passage on a 'cattle boat' in September '63. My neighbours maintain that I still sound like I am some-what of a 'newbie' to this part of the continent.

Ken
 

mpirie

Member
Registered User
I know the feeling.....despite moving from the east coast to the west after 50-odd years.....i know i'll never be considered a local :)
 

KenS

Active Member
Registered User
I know the feeling.....despite moving from the east coast to the west after 50-odd years.....i know i'll never be considered a local :)
But you could still learn to be-friend the midges, the muckle coos and the smir that soaks almost to the bone 8-(

Ken
 

mono

Member
Registered User
The midges are the only bad side of Scotland!
They find me from within a mile ... ;-(((
But I still love Scotland!!
 

KenS

Active Member
Registered User
At least ther are no "Black flies" that eat you alive (almost) that are the wost curse in N Ontario. They are much smaller tha 'mozies' but they (quietly swarm really BAD)..land on you and bite a chunk of flesh and you don't FEEL it...(I believer there is a 'local anaesthetic involved in their siliva... but you bleed like Hell. Cattle (and the usual 'residents' and cattle up that way suffer really bad)... Insect 'barrier' sprays/creams
do not (prevent the black-flies remove a chunk of flesh and an leaving a small amount of an anti-coagilent so that the blood keeps 'flowing') do not do good job of protecting 'outside' workers.
When photographing results of post-grad's 'field-work" we HAD to wear a fine mesh "hood" to protect us from serious 'blood loss' before the work was "finished"
There have been numerous 'folk songs' about them... The most 'popular' is the "Log driving Waltz" They do not BUZZ like mosquitoes... you don't hear the black fly

"
"

Ken
 
Last edited:

KenS

Active Member
Registered User
Window box geenery.jpg
C/U of greenery in my neighbour's 'inside' window-box on a cold January day with my Linhof monorail. Ilford FP4,240 mm Grandagon and exposed for 'about' 3 seconds @ f22+1/3
and Normal 'rotary' development in Pyrocat HD in BTZS tubes.

Ken
 

KenS

Active Member
Registered User
Single floret .jpg

Found this somehow 'forgotten' close-up file hiding on my HD that was made after my deciding at the time that I needed a higher magnification image of but a part of the 'whole' of the 'patch of the undergrowth would be well worth making... Ilford FP4 behind the 240 Sironar (for a better working distance) exposure was not 'recorded' to paper but was successfully developed as 'normal with Pyrocat HD in BTZS tubes.

Ken
 

KenS

Active Member
Registered User
1748

I went down to the darkroom last night to mix a new batch of Pyrocat HD to process a new sheet of film and needed but a small aliquot of the final mix using a syringe. After 'doing what had to be done' I got to 'thinking' that there might be a good image for submitting to close-up but not macro' went back upstairs with my black velvet and a piece of cleaned glass.
Spread the velvet on and the glass the dining room table and placed the partially filled syringe there-on. "Looks good' I thought (even under the overhead 'soft' light (with four 60 watt light bulbs behind the large 'white glass' "bowl')
set up the Linhof on the tripod with 240mm lens behind which was a newly loaded sheet of TX 400. camera pointed 'down and rear standard was put to 'vertical',

Indicated exposure was 1/2 second @ f16+1/3 and adjusted for bellows extension. Development was 'Normal' in Pyrocat HD
in my BTZS tubes

Ken
 
Top